Is the Ford F150 the top car?

I 'd add Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is somewhere in the leading 3 however with those domestics you certainly have my top four of perpetuity for reliability. Brian created: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never had an engine issue. Corrosion is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just seemed like a diesel.

I ask yourself how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time obtaining out of it's own method ... the 300i6 would certainly do everything I require this vehicle to do patgizz wrote: 3 things in the vehicle world refuse to break.

those ought to be held as the criteria to which every little thing else is measured. sadly, practically whatever else pales in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, as a result of the outpour of appreciation, it looked great so I acquired it, here's the advertisement lmk what you guys think Oops, didn't suggest to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.

Is the Ford e150 the top car? (Our Review in Durham)

first order of biz though, I'm fairly big, and the guiding wheel to seat is rather slim ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only problem I've ever seen with vehicles like that, are damaged shifters. Ford made them a little too difficult and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.

Keep in mind the gas mileage will not be the ideal in the world, however it will damn sure run permanently. Never had an engine issue.

When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just appeared like a diesel. I wonder how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time obtaining out of it's own method ... The engine bay had not been created for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One Canister eliminate an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, however it sucks.

WonkoTheSane wrote: spitfirebill wrote: In reply to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he say to necessitate this? I'm really interested. I didn't see anything in his reply that would require this reaction. "They are typically dependable as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones composed: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck.

Is the Ford F150 the ultimate car?

When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just seemed like a diesel. I wonder how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...

Very really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I didn't make clear ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor due to the fact that when I had to find a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through each in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that wasn't sludged up truly badly.

Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're mosting likely to chat about a few concerns of these vans, but I I'm clearly not mosting likely to come out and claim one is much better than the various other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are a few of the differences in between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same vehicle.

They appear to be a little much more made use of because area, but, you understand, those are some of the usages, but they're basically the same classification of lorry. Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. What issues do you see in between these two cars? Bernie: Yeah. Let's speak concerning engine and in fact just to define that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I indicate, these vans have been around for a long time.

Is the Ford F150 the ultimate truck?

And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has been around considering that, you recognize, around that time too. We're not going to get back into, into the earlier things. Since 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more prominent and I wouldn't truly suggest a V6 engine.

There's a lot of problems with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with strike to these engines, because they didn't have adequate threading in the spark plug, which caused problems.

Very very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I really did not make clear ... my poor In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor due to the fact that when I had to find a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that wasn't sludged up actually terribly.

Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to chat regarding a couple of issues of these vans, however I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the same car.

Is the Ford e150 the best truck?

Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. Allow's chat about engine and in fact simply to define that the model years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you recognize, I mean, these vans have been around for a long time.

And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around because, you know, around that time too. So we're not going to obtain back right into, into the earlier things. Considering that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more popular and I would not truly advise a V6 engine.

There's a lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with blow to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have sufficient threading in the spark plug, which caused problems.